The below following are
the contents of the letter we wrote to Senior Officials of Border &
Immigration Agency (Home Office) on 21st April 2008.
------
In order to help you in
applying the Judgment to all, we have identified the following
categories of the affected Highly Skilled Migrants who were admitted
under the HSMP programme prior to the newly imposed changes to the
system in November 2006. In all fairness they should be re-instated as
per the old criteria of the HSMP Scheme / HSMP Status:
1. Highly Skilled Migrants
who were refused extensions to their Leave to Remain under the new
rules and who failed the AIT appeals process.
2. Highly Skilled Migrants
who were refused extensions to their Leave to Remain and are awaiting
determination of the AIT.
3. Highly Skilled Migrants
who were refused extensions to their Leave to Remain and were denied
the right of appeal against that refusal.
4. Highly Skilled Migrants
who submitted Leave to Remain applications out-of-time as the result
of trying to meet the November 2006 changes to the Highly Skilled
Migrant Programme.
5. Highly Skilled Migrants
who lost their AIT appeal / reconsideration and were deported from the
UK.
6. Highly Skilled Migrants
who lost their AIT appeal / reconsideration and who have remained in
the UK deemed as over-stayers.
7. Highly Skilled Migrants
who lost their AIT appeal / reconsideration and have submitted
applications to court of appeal or high court.
8.
Highly Skilled Migrants who left
the UK
after getting refusals and those who left UK without applying for
Further Leave to Remain as a consequence of the November 2006 changes
to the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme. Since the application form as
well clearly stated not to fill it if they do not get necessary points
and it would be highly unfair to expect them to fill it and waste
their left over funds knowing that they would be issued with a
refusal.
9. Highly Skilled Migrants
who switched to a Work Permit as the result of the November 2006
changes to the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme.
10. Highly Skilled Migrants
who tried to switch to a Work Permit as the result of the November
2006 changes to the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme and were refused.
11. Highly Skilled Migrants
who applied for Indefinite Leave to Remain after four (4) years rather
than HSMP extension as a result of the November 2006 changes to the
Highly Skilled Migrant Programme.
12. Highly Skilled Migrants
who won their AIT appeal and were granted Discretionary Leave to
Remain should be reinstated under the old criteria of HSMP.
13. Highly Skilled Migrants
who are being detained by the Home Office as illegal immigrants due to
problems with the changes.
14. Highly Skilled Migrants
whose passports are held by the Home Office as the result of a failed
extensions application.
15. There are also those who
were admitted in the scheme between the suspension period from 7th
November 2006 and 5th December 2006.
16. We believe those who
were admitted in the scheme as at April 2006 should be allowed to
obtain Indefinite Leave to Remain after 4 years rather than another
extension. The Judgment of Justice Newman acknowledges ILR issue when
he highlights “the old
scheme constituted an integrated and entire programme and that it was
not open to the government to alter the terms and conditions upon
which the pre-arranged stages were to be implemented”
(Para 26). Ignoring this crucial issue will only lead to further
litigations on the ILR front.
17. The application
processing fee is £750 presently which is comparatively very high
compared to the old fee of £350. The old criteria for extension
were economic activity or attempt to be economically active while the
changes expected a high income from individuals. Thus we believe it
would be inappropriate to apply the new fee of £750 which is meant for
high earners under the new system to HSMP holders who came under old
criteria. The old fee should be reinstated for those who were admitted
between 2002 and as at 7th November 2006.
18. We also want to ensure
that English Language requirement and Maintenance funds requirement is
not applied to those who were admitted between 2002 and as at 7th
November 2006.
In overall
it would be important to realise the various hardships encountered
because of the implementation of the “illegal changes”. It would be
important empathically to make decisions in reinstating the above HSMP
holders’ status.
--------