From:
Amit Kapadia
Date:
Mon, June 16, 2008
To: Lin Homer
Dear Lin,
Thank you for your response. We do not believe that the increase in
application fee to the amount of £750 would have taken place
irrespectively of the Dec 2006 changes to the Highly Skilled Migrant
Programme. We believe that the fee for extension of existing Highly
Skilled Migrant permits is implicit in our judicial review claim and
integral to the resulting court order.
We do understand that it is Home Office's prerogative to increase the
fee, but we contend that to have increased it exorbitantly by almost
double has been unjustified and unreasonable, especially considering
the changes in fee was made due to high expectations from Highly
Skilled Migrants
such as significant contribution towards the economy etc. This
expectation and subsequent fee rise was in line with the introduction
of the points based extension criteria and thereon the tier system.
It is also unfair to apply such high fees to migrants who need to
undergo a second extension (the original 1+3 category) to finish the
additional one year for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) due to the
April 2006 changes in the ILR qualifying criteria. Highly Skilled
Migrants who are thus caught by the lengthening of the ILR qualifying
period thus face much larger and extra payments than they could
reasonably have expected or planned.
We consider the increase in fee as arbitrary, since even with
inflation taken into account the new amount is disproportionally high.
The only reason that is clearly relevant to this exorbitant hike in
fee is the introduction of the new points-based system for the
extension of visas, and as such, applying this increased fee to
existing migrants who benefit from the Judicial Review can be
considered as an abuse of power and not to adhere to the spirit of the
judgement.
I hope you would reconsider your position on this matter.
Regards
Amit Kapadia
Executive Director,
HSMP Forum
www.hsmpforum.org
--------